Provide Two Distinct Proofs 2 Points Each That Dirichlet s Function is No where Continuous Onr
In mathematics, the Dirichlet function [1] [2] is the indicator function 1 Q or of the set of rational numbers Q, i.e. 1 Q (x) = 1 if x is a rational number and 1 Q (x) = 0 if x is not a rational number (i.e. an irrational number).
It is named after the mathematician Peter Gustav Lejeune Dirichlet.[3] It is an example of pathological function which provides counterexamples to many situations.
Topological properties [edit]
- The Dirichlet function is nowhere continuous.
Proof
- If y is rational, then f(y) = 1. To show the function is not continuous at y, we need to find an ε such that no matter how small we choose δ, there will be points z within δ of y such that f(z) is not within ε of f(y) = 1. In fact, 1/2 is such an ε. Because the irrational numbers are dense in the reals, no matter what δ we choose we can always find an irrational z within δ of y, and f(z) = 0 is at least 1/2 away from 1.
- If y is irrational, then f(y) = 0. Again, we can take ε = 1/2, and this time, because the rational numbers are dense in the reals, we can pick z to be a rational number as close to y as is required. Again, f(z) = 1 is more than 1/2 away from f(y) = 0.
- The Dirichlet function can be constructed as the double pointwise limit of a sequence of continuous functions, as follows:
Periodicity [edit]
For any real number x and any positive rational number T, 1 Q (x + T) = 1 Q (x). The Dirichlet function is therefore an example of a real periodic function which is not constant but whose set of periods, the set of rational numbers, is a dense subset of R.
Integration properties [edit]
- The Dirichlet function is not Riemann-integrable on any segment of R whereas it is bounded because the set of its discontinuity points is not negligible (for the Lebesgue measure).
- The Dirichlet function provides a counterexample showing that the monotone convergence theorem is not true in the context of the Riemann integral.
Proof
Using an enumeration of the rational numbers between 0 and 1, we define the function f n (for all nonnegative integer n) as the indicator function of the set of the first n terms of this sequence of rational numbers. The increasing sequence of functions f n (which are nonnegative, Riemann-integrable with a vanishing integral) pointwise converges to the Dirichlet function which is not Riemann-integrable.
- The Dirichlet function is Lebesgue-integrable on R and its integral over R is zero because it is zero except on the set of rational numbers which is negligible (for the Lebesgue measure).
See also [edit]
- Thomae's function, a variation that is discontinuous only at the rational numbers
References [edit]
- ^ "Dirichlet-function", Encyclopedia of Mathematics, EMS Press, 2001 [1994]
- ^ Dirichlet Function — from MathWorld
- ^ Lejeune Dirichlet, Peter Gustav (1829). "Sur la convergence des séries trigonométriques qui servent à représenter une fonction arbitraire entre des limites données". Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik. 4: 157–169.
- ^ Dunham, William (2005). The Calculus Gallery. Princeton University Press. p. 197. ISBN0-691-09565-5.
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dirichlet_function
0 Response to "Provide Two Distinct Proofs 2 Points Each That Dirichlet s Function is No where Continuous Onr"
Post a Comment